Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Front of House Engineer David Powles, uses Lauten at Fiddlers Green Festival

David Powles has over 30 years experience as an engineer with acts including Pink Floyd, Bob Marley and the Wailers, Frank Sinatra, Dionne Warwick, Genesis, Procol Harum, Bad Company, Rory Gallagher, George Benson, Alice Cooper and others. And now David has decided to commit much of his time to acoustic based live work, which has lead him to work with many acts. It is this expertise that was also the reason for David to be selected as front of house for “The Fiddlers Green festival” in Rostrevor, Northern Ireland.

David used a range of Lauten mics on the Festival in August which was also recorded by the BBC (N. Ireland) for broadcast. “I enjoyed using the mics at the Festival” said David “They provided a very warm, precise and musical sound, requiring very little EQing apart from Hi-Pass filters, I didn't want to colour the natural sound of the mics by EQing for monitoring purposes”. David went on to single out one mic in particular “I thought the Horizon mics were excellent”

Even artistes commented to Dave that the mics in certain cases provided the best acoustic guitar sound that they had ever heard.
Pictured: (Top Right) Marcia & Damian Howard, Australia (Left) Tao Rodiguez-Seeger, USA (Bottom) Heather Campbell & Vince Peets, Canada

Wednesday, October 01, 2008

Capsule Simulation Software by Lauten Audio - A brief overview

Dr. Charles Chen PhD of Lauten Audio has written a software simulation program for microphone transducer capsule simulation. The results in this article are for pressure capsules only. A pressure capsule is the easiest to simulate and there have been simulation results in published papers. However, Dr Chen’s simulation software goes beyond any published results and provides a method for simulating pressure gradient capsules along with configurations of the back plate, such as the pore distribution affects on capsule behavior. These results will not be published due to trade secrets.

The capsules used for this article are all made by Western Electric. As to not reveal any information regarding our proprietary designs, we have used the capsule parameters for this simulation from a research paper (PhD thesis) published in The Journal of the Acoustical Society.

These capsules share the same back plate configuration (diameter, thickness, pore size and distributions), the only difference being the diaphragm (surface density and tension) and spacing between the diaphragm and the back plate. The 111070 with polyethylene membrane has the lowest tension, and the 11670 with metal membrane has the highest one. The capsule simulation results below are of these capsules.

In Figures 1 & 2 the top result is the output voltage of the capsule expressed as sensitivity. (click images to enlarge)

CapsuleFreqRespWestern111070.jpg (126364 bytes)
Fig. 1 (Western Electric 111070)

Notes: 0 dBV is defined as 1V output at 94dB SPL. All capsules can only output several millivolts so the sensitivity is always a negative number.

CapsuleFreqRespWestern11670.jpg (124503 bytes)
Fig. 2 (Western Electric 11670)

The second result shows the diaphragm displacement from its balanced position (determined by the bias voltage) in nanometer averaged over 15 rings of the diaphragm. The third and forth results show the sound pressure on the back of the diaphragm, amplitude and phase, respectively. You can see how the tension and the spacing affect their behavior.

Notes: Pressure capsules only receive sound in the front of the diaphragm because the chamber behind the diaphragm is sealed and no outside sound can reach the back side of the diaphragm. But as the diaphragm is driven by the front sound pressure, it suppresses the air in the chamber and produces the reacting pressure to the back side of the diaphragm. The net driving force for the diaphragm is the difference of the front sound pressure and the back pressure. For pressure gradient capsules, the back pressure is very important.

To see more details of the simulation, we have provided (Figures 3,4,5,6,7 and 8) six diaphragm movement results for these capsules at three frequencies, 100Hz, 1000Hz, and 10000Hz, showing the shape of the diaphragm and its movement in half a vibration period. You might expect all parts of the diaphragm (rings in the simulation) should move in the same direction, and for higher frequency, the only difference is all parts move faster, but still coherently. But it is not the case. At higher frequencies, the vibration of the diaphragm became more complicated. The neighboring rings can move in the opposite directions. This becomes more obvious when the tension goes down.

All these results are consistent with and even better than the published research papers and well supported by the real measurement data presented in various papers. Although the results are the same, Dr Chen developed a totally different mathematical method, which allows us to not only be able to simulate the pressure capsule, but also the pressure gradient capsule and dual diaphragm capsule, which no one to our knowledge has ever published.

Not shown are how the change in the configuration of the back plate, such as how the pore distribution affects the capsule behavior. These results have never been published in research papers and we can not publicly reveal these at this time.

DiaphragmMoveWestern111070_100Hz.jpg (68111 bytes)

Fig. 3 (Western Electric 111070 100Hz)

DiaphragmMoveWestern111070_1000Hz.jpg (70047 bytes)

Fig. 4 (Western Electric 111070 1000Hz)

DiaphragmMoveWestern111070_10000Hz.jpg (92564 bytes)

Fig. 5 (Western Electric 111070 10000Hz)

DiaphragmMoveWestern11670_100Hz.jpg (66752 bytes)

Fig. 6 (Western Electric 11670 100Hz)

DiaphragmMoveWestern11670_1000Hz.jpg (68620 bytes)

Fig. 7 (Western Electric 11670 1000Hz)

DiaphragmMoveWestern11670_10000Hz.jpg (82946 bytes)

Fig. 8 (Western Electric 11670 10000Hz)